Charlotte's Web

Blogging my world since 2006

Mother’s Milk

13 Comments

I devoured Edward St Aubyn’s Mother’s Milk in one sitting yesterday, so brilliant and unputdownable it is. I knew from the opening paragraph that I was going to love it:

Why had they pretended to kill him when he was born? Keeping him awake for days, banging his head again and again against a closed cervix; twisting the cord around his throat and throttling him; chomping through his mother’s abdomen with cold shears; clamping his head and wrenching his neck from side to side; dragging him out of his home and hitting him; shining lights in his eyes and doing experiments; taking him away from his mother while she lay on the table, half-dead. Maybe the idea was to destroy his nostalgia for the old world. First the confinement to make him hungry for space, then pretending to kill him so that he would be grateful for the space when he got it, even this loud desert, with only the bandages of his mother’s arms to wrap around him, never the whole thing again, the whole warm things all around him, being everything.

What St Aubyn does here, and throughout the book, so brilliantly is see things from a baby’s and a child’s perspective. I have never read another book about families that inhabits everyone’s viewpoints so well: either you have the adults being well-represented and the children depicted at a distance, or vice versa, but St Aubyn gets into everyone’s heads so convincingly that as a reader you feel not only that you know everyone, but that they are your family too. I don’t think I’ve ever read a book that does this so effectively, but also movingly and with humour. I snorted in recognition throughout, so that Lily, who was beading next to me, eventually asked me to stop.

The story takes a look at the Melrose family over a period of four Augusts, from 2000 to 2003. The family usually holiday in France at Patrick’s – the father’s – childhood home, which his mother Eleanor has recently ceded to a New Age foundation. The family now only have rights to spend August there, and they have to tolerate the presence of foundation director Seamus, who is aggressively touchy-feely, believes he is a shaman and prefers having rituals to conversations. Patrick, a London barrister, is filled with rage that his mother has given his home away, that it is now taken over by Seamus and he is a mere disinherited visitor. He mocks Seamus privately, and to his face:

“Did you know,” said Patrick, addressing Seamus again, “that among the caribou herdsmen of Lapland, the top shaman gets to drink the urine of the reindeer that has eaten the magic mushrooms, and his assistant drinks the urine of the top shaman, and so on, all the way down to the lowest of the low who scramble in the snow, pleading for a splash of twelfth-generation caribou piss?”
“I didn’t know that,” said Seamus, flatly.

Patrick’s rage not only stems from his feeling that his mother has taken away his birthright, but also that his wife Mary – offspring of the virulently self-regarding Kettle – is being consumed by their children. Having been emotionally cut off by her mother as a child, Mary is making it up to her children with a devotion that, while not martyrish, is slavish in its totality. Patrick, making the logical connection that so many men do, uses his feeling of being ousted from Mary’s affections to develop a violent depression, a major drinking habit and an affair with an old girlfriend. Mary, aware of the affair, grows colder to her husband and ever warmer towards her children until Patrick eventually accuses her of using Thomas, three, as a “lover”.

While the bare bones of the story may seem melodramatic at first telling, this is leavened by St Aubyn’s piercing sense of humour and his tenderness with all his main protagonists. Of all the books I’ve read this year, this would be the one I would most want to have written: it is funny, moving and insightful.

For Litlove, I would also like to point out that it has at its heart the question of motherhood. There is Mary, the ur-Mother, giving her all, at the expense of everything including her marriage, to her children; there is the dreadful Kettle (“a lonely martyr to her own high standards” – don’t we all know a few of these?); and the poor crippled Eleanor, who by selecting oily Seamus as the recipient of all her earthly possessions, has alienated her family and impoverished herself. The nature of all three is encapsulated here, an early part of the book before Patrick is eaten by his own rage:

As usual, Mary had gone to sleep with Thomas, leaving Patrick split between admiration and abandonment. Mary was such a devoted mother because she knew what it felt like not to have one. Patrick also knew what it felt like, and as a former beneficiary of Mary’s maternal overdrive, he sometimes had to remind himself that he wasn’t an infant anymore, to argue that there were real children in the house, not yet horror-trained; he sometimes had to give himself a good talking-to. Nevertheless he waited for the maturing effects of parenthood. Being surrounded by children brought him closer to his own childishness.

The last sentence, to me, says it all. Being a parent gives you the stark choice of having to grow up or regress. However, although you may choose to be the grown-up, you do also get given the wonderful opportunity to play with being the child. You can share childlike emotions, games and inhabit their world, but you also have to take yourself in hand and be the one on whose shoulders the responsibilties lie. That is the crux of St Aubyn’s book: how we all cope in our different ways with the terrifying choices that parenthood presents.

Author: charlotteotter

Novelist, feminist, crime writer

13 thoughts on “Mother’s Milk

  1. I’ve been meaning to get to this book but am set on reading the Some Hope trilogy first. Did you read any of the preceding books; if not, it doesn’t read as if it affected your experience with Mother’s Milk.

  2. Imani, this is the first St Aubyn I’ve read. Clearly, I need to read the rest!

  3. Great, it’s not too late to add it to my Christmas list. Funny how much of motherhood and family life is universal. The feelings of fathers everywhere. My own husband has “confessed” to feeling like a bit of an intruder in our lifes. I stay home with the kids and although everyone is thrilled to see him when he comes home, it is not always an easy transition. I often felt that he harboured feelings of jealousy that the kids got more attention. For me, it is the feeling of frustration of not being all things to all of them, of not wanting to be.

    Sound like a fascinating read, I can’t wait.

  4. Wow, now that’s what I call a review. I am buying this myself for Christmas, and am going to stay in bed all day on boxing day to read it. Now that’s what I call a Christmas present

  5. Alida and Ms Vanielje, enjoy it! I would love to hear what you think afterwards.

  6. Oh God, we are definitely not secret twins. I HATED this book. It is clever but I found it deeply, profoundly, (insert other synonym for deep here) annoying. I could not empathise with these characters. They were all vile. Even the mother in the end. The father is unbearable. The whole book is an intelligent, beautifully written whine that he is not getting his mother’s money. I could not abide it. I read it for my bookclub and all the others adored it. Most distressing.

  7. Anne, there is no doubt that the father is infantile, but he is so funny, or St Aubyn is so funny about him, that I forgave him. So many people out there are infantile, but don’t go the extra mile and be funny about it.

    On another level, isn’t is possible not to find characters likable (I wouldn’t want Patrick as a friend, perhaps, except when he was being amusing) but still like a book? This is a question that crops up at my book-club often.

  8. Charlotte, could I please place this in the Red Tent Blog? Excellent review of the book. Though I, like Anne, wasn’t able to overcome my annoyance sometimes.

  9. Lia, feel free to use it. I agree that I wouldn’t want to be married to Patrick and he was annoying, but I think that was the point: that he had not allowed parenthood to grow him up.

  10. What an inspiring post, you definitely have me wanting to read that book now.

  11. I’m like Anne, I really loathed the book, and am not sure why I bothered to read it when I had already read and hated Some Hope by the same author; as Anne says it was one long whine. It seemed too knowingly smart, and there was a vein of authorial arrogance running through it which got right up my nose. I also found the main characters very unpleasant but that wasn’t really what turned me off, and I have enjoyed other books where the characters were pretty ghastly. In Some Hope I got particularly fed up with the endless descriptions of shooting up on heroin which St Aubyn wrote in a “look at how worldly and sophisticated I am to be able to write this” sort of way, and I felt that tone carried on through Mother’s Milk. Did I learn anything from the book? – no. Did I gain enjoyment from reading the book? – no. Did I like any of the characters ?-no. Would I read another book by the author ?- no.

  12. Herschelian, I’m fascinated by the strong reactions this book evokes. Me loving it, and you and Anne (both of whom I’m usually strongly in accord) hating it.

  13. I read Some Hope first which begins when Patrick is a child and immediately moved on to Mother’s Milk. I absolutely loved both books and, a year and a half later, still think about Patrick’s life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s